Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)

[Dreamic]

(09-03-2022 05:57 AM)aelius Wrote:  Suit yourself

Maybe as games get more demanding in time and my PC is averaging lower framerates below 120fps in demanding games this will be more appealing, but otherwise I don't know if capping below is worth it if I would be playing a game that could be shooting up to 160fps/Hz+ sometimes for example. For such a game that averages mid-100's I would need to lower the 120-240 for the times it drops below 120fps.

Anyways your ideal solution is pretty much if most of the demanding games you play average below 120fps, and then the only other things you play are like eSports titles like Valorant, CSGO, etc that will always be 240fps+, set V rate to 119-240 (cause you can't do exactly half/decimals in CRU, actual rate is 239.957Hz half = 119.9785Hz) and then FPS limit at 115/116~.

Maybe I'll do it when all the new games I'm playing are averaging below that, if I'm not upgrading my PC. A good 360Hz monitor for a 180Hz limit or something would be nicer. If we hypothetically scaled things differently, you wouldn't cap a 60Hz monitor at 30Hz/29fps if you could get up to 45fps sometimes with VRR. But yes 30 to 45 is more noticeable than 120 to 180... I think the extra framerate 120+ if it happens often enough is probably more important than the pixel response. 180fps at 180Hz is better than 120fps at 240Hz in my opinion. Anyways I don't have anything more to contribute, I see the Device ID thing was added to the VRR section of the first post.