Monitor Tests Forum

Full Version: Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814
(08-13-2016 07:34 PM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-12-2016 05:00 PM)Cross-Flow Wrote: [ -> ]Done Blush
The extension block has a vendor-specific data block with AMD's vendor ID. Since it's not publicly documented, I don't know what all the bytes mean, but it seems to have the FreeSync range in there. CRU doesn't have a way to edit the data block directly, but it can import hex data from text files.

I formatted the .txt file to group the data blocks and resolutions:

Look for this line:
68 1a 00 00 01 01 28 4b 00

Hex 28 = 40
Hex 4b = 75

Try changing those numbers (30-75 Hz would be 1e 4b). Then import the text file using CRU.

Thank you very much for your work! What is the number for 72 Hz? And could you post a list with all relevant Numbers like from 48Hz down to 30Hz? Or can you explain how i know the right number for the right Hz?
(09-29-2016 10:02 AM)SofMaz Wrote: [ -> ]Thank you very much for your work! What is the number for 72 Hz? And could you post a list with all relevant Numbers like from 48Hz down to 30Hz? Or can you explain how i know the right number for the right Hz?
I just released a new preview version that can edit the FreeSync range data block: https://www.monitortests.com/forum/Threa...preview-P2

Just import the file and edit the FreeSync range data block in the extension block.
Hi there, Finland here

First off, ToastyX, thank you for engaged and world class game on all these displays. You're exactly the kind of person who it's worth regging and logging on forums for. (So, first post, too.)

So on to my question; I treated myself for a new 4k75Hz 48" TV and a HTC Vive for my bday. Sadly, it's been nothing but a hassle. Coming here, I thought it to be a good idea to force my TV (given HDMI 2.0 specs, 600HZ rate, the works according to the box. Brand Procaster mod.# 48UNB700) to just give the damn 4k60 pic already. Soo ran cru.exe, also the high speed ati patch, but just didn't get above 40Hz. This was with a high speed 50€ hdmi cable --> "oh, it's a bandwidth thing" --> 3D Club DP-HDMI 2.0 adapter, onto "oh so 15gbps" 80€ HDMI 2.0 cable - which just gave a worse picture, blinking with mostly dark, loads of artefactsSad
Giving insult to injury, as I had the Vive headset connected but not yet installed, cru.exe did 'something' to it, breaking SteamVR into a garbling crashing mess just to start with.
In a fit of desperation, I deleted all unplugged USB devices, deep cleaned latest radeon drivers totally with DDU, twice cleaned registry with CCleaner and also cleaned normally, twice. Uninstalled and deleted anything remotely related to steam and steamvr, and started anew. Yay for green light on headset, drivers installed, Vive installed but lo and behold, it demands, on every bootup, the initiating procedures from scratch and not recognising more than one hand-controller.

Going on two weeks now, I've come to conclude that atleast the Vives edid somehow has been altered by cru.exe, into what SteamVR does not recognise properly. Can this be reversed? Am I even right?

Also, no clue anymore on why the signal worsened from pc to tv. Atm, I have started everything AGAIN from absolute beginning, just installed the Radeon drivers and will try to patch for high speed with your tool.

This is all I have left to do before having to give up. Any help with this so far useless 1.5k€ bday gift would be more appreciated than anything in a long time. I don't even remember when I last would've regged to a forum like this - been plying and poking with pc's for 31 years and going.


Thanks
(09-30-2016 11:20 AM)NickV Wrote: [ -> ]So on to my question; I treated myself for a new 4k75Hz 48" TV and a HTC Vive for my bday. Sadly, it's been nothing but a hassle. Coming here, I thought it to be a good idea to force my TV (given HDMI 2.0 specs, 600HZ rate, the works according to the box. Brand Procaster mod.# 48UNB700) to just give the damn 4k60 pic already. Soo ran cru.exe, also the high speed ati patch, but just didn't get above 40Hz. This was with a high speed 50€ hdmi cable --> "oh, it's a bandwidth thing" --> 3D Club DP-HDMI 2.0 adapter, onto "oh so 15gbps" 80€ HDMI 2.0 cable - which just gave a worse picture, blinking with mostly dark, loads of artefactsSad
What video card do you have? Only the RX-series cards support HDMI 2.0 directly. For other cards, you need to use the DP-HDMI 2.0 adapter. The patch would not help with this. Make sure you are not using CRU or the patch with the adapter. If you're still getting artifacts, then either the adapter is faulty, or the cable is not as good as it claims.

If you want to try CRU with HDMI 2.0, you need to add an HDMI support data block AND an HDMI 2.0 support data block in the extension block with the new preview version of CRU: https://www.monitortests.com/forum/Threa...preview-P2

(09-30-2016 11:20 AM)NickV Wrote: [ -> ]Giving insult to injury, as I had the Vive headset connected but not yet installed, cru.exe did 'something' to it, breaking SteamVR into a garbling crashing mess just to start with.
CRU should not change anything that you didn't change, and even if something did change, you can run reset-all.exe and reboot to remove all EDID overrides. DDU also removes all EDID overrides, and CRU does nothing to the hardware, so something else is going on.

I suggest looking through these articles:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Vive/comments/4...nd_tricks/
https://support.steampowered.com/kb_arti...-SDZC-9326
https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki...leshooting
Thank you brother, now I have something to go on - I will report to here in a short manner, for others potential future reference.

edit; GPU's are 3 x 290 in trifire under water but not OC'd at all.
I'm getting intrigued by all this, so might play around with CRU more once baseline is established. The OLEDs in the Vive are begging for a bit of cru lovin, that's for sure.

editedit; Hardware specs just to be clear are, R9 290 x 3 (in trifire for now). It's become clear that they have HDMI 1.3 native ports and a DisplayPort as addition.
In that, a Club3D active Displayport->HDMI 2.0 adapter is attached, being the only way to cram out the 4k60Hz from the cards. Next up is a Belkin ProHD 4000 HDMI cable; looking closer at the packaging it only says 15.8+ Gbps - not specifically HDMI 2.0. Good enough, yeah? And finally the receiver, which I've double-checked that all HDMI ports are 4k60Hz capable.

editeditedit; the 15.8Gbps isn't enough for 4k60Hz - sending it back and going for products intended for spearhead clown customers. Oh well. Back to fighting with the Vive, for a bit of change.
Has anyone tried this program with the HP ZR2740W, whether Windows 7, 8, 8.1 or 10? HP abandoned support for an otherwise really awesome monitor. Here is a discussion of other users' travails -- http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Desktop-Vid...793/page/3

TAGS: ZR2740 ZR2740w 2740w 2740 driver native resolution
(10-02-2016 08:26 PM)onix Wrote: [ -> ]Has anyone tried this program with the HP ZR2740W, whether Windows 7, 8, 8.1 or 10? HP abandoned support for an otherwise really awesome monitor. Here is a discussion of other users' travails -- http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Desktop-Vid...793/page/3
You shouldn't need to use CRU with the HP ZR2740w. The monitor only supports 2560x1440 @ 60 Hz and 1280x720 @ 60 Hz, both of which should already be defined in the EDID.

Monitors don't need drivers. It should be plug and play. What video card do you have? Are you using DVI or DisplayPort?
(10-03-2016 06:45 AM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-02-2016 08:26 PM)onix Wrote: [ -> ]Has anyone tried this program with the HP ZR2740W, whether Windows 7, 8, 8.1 or 10? HP abandoned support for an otherwise really awesome monitor. Here is a discussion of other users' travails -- http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Desktop-Vid...793/page/3
You shouldn't need to use CRU with the HP ZR2740w. The monitor only supports 2560x1440 @ 60 Hz and 1280x720 @ 60 Hz, both of which should already be defined in the EDID.

Monitors don't need drivers. It should be plug and play. What video card do you have? Are you using DVI or DisplayPort?

Thanks for the reply! I have tried DP-to-DP, HDMI-to-DVI, and DP-to-DVI, but even though the OS (in this case Win10) recognizes the model of the display, it does not show anything other than 1280x720 in the pull-down of resolutions. (The thread link I posted shows other people with similar experiences.) I think the driver for Windows is defective. It is v1.0.0 written for Win 7 and then never upgraded. The same monitor works fine DVI-to-DVI on a MacBook Pro with latest OSX.
(10-03-2016 07:38 AM)onix Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for the reply! I have tried DP-to-DP, HDMI-to-DVI, and DP-to-DVI, but even though the OS (in this case Win10) recognizes the model of the display, it does not show anything other than 1280x720 in the pull-down of resolutions. (The thread link I posted shows other people with similar experiences.) I think the driver for Windows is defective. It is v1.0.0 written for Win 7 and then never upgraded. The same monitor works fine DVI-to-DVI on a MacBook Pro with latest OSX.
The HP ZR2740w requires DisplayPort or dual-link DVI to get 2560x1440. DP-to-DP should work, but HDMI-to-DVI will not, and DP-to-DVI will not work without an expensive active dual-link adapter.

This is not an issue with the monitor driver. Monitors don't need drivers. This is either a hardware limitation on the computer or a graphics driver issue. I need to know what video card or GPU you have to know for sure. What is listed under "Display adapters" in the Device Manager?

Is the MacBook Pro the same computer you're having the issue on with Windows 10? There hasn't been a dual-link DVI port on a MacBook Pro since 2007, and that model doesn't have DisplayPort or HDMI, so I'm confused about what you have.
(10-03-2016 08:40 AM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]The HP ZR2740w requires DisplayPort or dual-link DVI to get 2560x1440. DP-to-DP should work, but HDMI-to-DVI will not, and DP-to-DVI will not work without an expensive active dual-link adapter.

This is not an issue with the monitor driver. Monitors don't need drivers. This is either a hardware limitation on the computer or a graphics driver issue. I need to know what video card or GPU you have to know for sure. What is listed under "Display adapters" in the Device Manager?

Is the MacBook Pro the same computer you're having the issue on with Windows 10? There hasn't been a dual-link DVI port on a MacBook Pro since 2007, and that model doesn't have DisplayPort or HDMI, so I'm confused about what you have.

It's quite possible the DP functionality of the monitor does not work at all. I am able to get the full resolution if I use a DVI-to-DVI connection from a MacBook on OSX (no virtual machine).

Two Lnovo laptops with Windows 7 & 10 recognize the name of the monitor in the Device Manager, but when attached to DVI, whether via conversion from DP (with a passive adapter) or via HDMI-to-DVI, the highest selectable resolution is 1280 x 720, like the thread linked in my original post describes. The Lenovo X1 Carbon (gen 4) is using only the native Intel GPU, and a Lenovo T430s has an NVIDIA chip (NVS 5200M). Neither have any luck with higher resolutions on the HP monitor.

I have a docking station for the T430s that has DVI out. I will have to try that out.

Incidentally, I know it is not my DP cable, since I can get it to work with other monitors.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814
Reference URL's