Monitor Tests Forum

Full Version: Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809
Just a simple question - how is the value for the exact refresh rate rounded in CRU?

Basically I noticed that sometimes mpv "Display FPS" will exactly match that CRU described including the three decimal places (e.g. both saying 72.000) but, for other refresh rates/resolutions, CRU will list as being exactly 0.001 Hz less, e.g. CRU stating that a refresh rate is 75.000Hz but mpv listing it as 75.001

I don't suppose this means that CRU always just rounds down, e.g. 75.00064Hz is listed as 75.000 in CRU?

(it may be worth mentioning that I'm actually using the Linux version of mpv; I've discovered that CRU running through WINE is quite useful on Linux for calculating much more exact refresh rates since the normal "cvt" command on Linux generates modes that are not all that exact, e.g. 74.857 rather than the 75.00Hz that it the cvt command claims - for this reason I don't suppose there's a way to have CRU directly output an xorg/xrandr-compatible modeline rather than what I've been doing of manually adding the corresponding CRU values together to essentially manually create a custom modeline?)
(07-07-2022 02:12 PM)IIISi Z16 HF LE Wrote: [ -> ][quote='kibato9999' pid='13635' dateline='1657141329']
Hi guys just got myself a new LG 32 inch 32GN63T UltraGear QHD 165Hz Monitor.
I have always used CRU to disable TV resolutions on my monitors and it has always worked but I have done the exact same way I have been doing for the past many years now and its not working for I always do this so that I can use Nvidia Super Resolution scaling otherwise it will always try and scale from a 1080P resolution even though my native is 1440P.

I have already deleted all resolutions that I would normally delete but nothing seems to change.

If anyone can help me it would be highly appreciated.

Your phots you submitted there are not visible they cannot be magnified..
Use atachment choose file and add atachment on the right

Thanks I have added in the attachment on this reply and have edited my original post.
(07-06-2022 09:02 PM)kibato9999 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi guys just got myself a new LG 32 inch 32GN63T UltraGear QHD 165Hz Monitor.
I have always used CRU to disable TV resolutions on my monitors and it has always worked but I have done the exact same way I have been doing for the past many years now and its not working for I always do this so that I can use Nvidia Super Resolution scaling otherwise it will always try and scale from a 1080P resolution even though my native is 1440P.

I have already deleted all resolutions that I would normally delete but nothing seems to change.
You need to read the section about extension blocks in the first post.
(07-07-2022 05:36 PM)Nintendo Maniac 64 Wrote: [ -> ]Just a simple question - how is the value for the exact refresh rate rounded in CRU?

Basically I noticed that sometimes mpv "Display FPS" will exactly match that CRU described including the three decimal places (e.g. both saying 72.000) but, for other refresh rates/resolutions, CRU will list as being exactly 0.001 Hz less, e.g. CRU stating that a refresh rate is 75.000Hz but mpv listing it as 75.001

I don't suppose this means that CRU always just rounds down, e.g. 75.00064Hz is listed as 75.000 in CRU?

(it may be worth mentioning that I'm actually using the Linux version of mpv; I've discovered that CRU running through WINE is quite useful on Linux for calculating much more exact refresh rates since the normal "cvt" command on Linux generates modes that are not all that exact, e.g. 74.857 rather than the 75.00Hz that it the cvt command claims - for this reason I don't suppose there's a way to have CRU directly output an xorg/xrandr-compatible modeline rather than what I've been doing of manually adding the corresponding CRU values together to essentially manually create a custom modeline?)
It's truncated (rounded down). This is intentional because I wanted to make sure 60.000 Hz means it's at least 60 Hz and not something like 59.9995 Hz. I thought about changing the actual value to conventional rounding, but then there would be a mismatch with the value in the text box, which is meant to be a minimum, so the text box would still have to be rounded down to produce the same actual value. CRU doesn't currently save the entered value because only the actual value based on the pixel clock is in the EDID, so it generates an entered value when editing an existing resolution. I want to make CRU 2.0 preserve the entered values and timing option to make it less confusing, so I might change the rounding then.

The cvt program rounds the pixel clock down to a multiple of 0.25 MHz because that's what the CVT standard says to do. I chose to ignore that part for CRU because I wanted more precision.

I also wanted to make it possible to export modelines to a file, but this is too complicated to implement with the current design of CRU because detailed resolutions can be in several places with different types of extension blocks. CRU 2.0 will make this much easier to implement because it will be able to consolidate all the resolutions in one list. I also thought about making the "Copy" button put the modeline in the clipboard, but I wasn't sure how useful that would be for a Windows program.
(07-06-2022 07:41 PM)IIISi Z16 HF LE Wrote: [ -> ]HI toastyX
I have little bit progressed .
I have purcahsed more advanced usb-c to hdmi 2.1 adapter Sabrent
Now I can enable HDR on mine Sam TV and windows 11 showing in resolution I can now select 100Hz or 120Hz for 4k but when I select it it just reverts back to 60Hz .
I don't really know whow to use yours soft I have tried to do detailed resolution top one But I tried 4k@120 bit won't let me from all drop down options all red.. Only when I tried 4k@75Hz it allowed select exact reduced. BUt I have restarted windows but it is not showing 4k@75Hz option in windows refresh rate settings.
How can I add ? Or I was wondering how to do 4k@120 but with limited colour sdepth 8bit and dinamic range to limited and output color format to 444 or 422
But you don't include these options in your soft?
You need to use a DisplayID extension block to add resolutions greater than 655.35 MHz pixel clock as explained in the first post. 4K @ 75 Hz should have worked though so the driver is ignoring it for some reason. 4K @ 100/120 Hz should already be defined in the extension block in the TV resolutions data block.

DisplayPort/USB-C has less bandwidth than HDMI 2.1, so the default 4K @ 100/120 Hz requires either YCbCr 4:2:2 or display stream compression (DSC). "Native (PC)" would bring the pixel clock down low enough for YCbCr/RGB 4:4:4 without DSC, but the TV might not support that timing.

8 bpc should always be available. Dynamic range is set in the GPU's control panel and not in the EDID. RGB color format should always be available. YCbCr color formats are listed in the HDMI data blocks in the extension block, but since you're using a DisplayPort/USB-C adapter, it might be in the display properties ("Edit..." button at the top of the main window). YCbCr 4:2:2 is normally supported and should be available without any changes, but I don't know if the adapter is messing that up.
(07-07-2022 08:06 PM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]This is intentional because I wanted to make sure 60.000 Hz means it's at least 60 Hz and not something like 59.9995 Hz. I thought about changing the actual value to conventional rounding, but then there would be a mismatch with the value in the text box, which is meant to be a minimum, so the text box would still have to be rounded down to produce the same actual value.

Would it be crazy to just simply show more decimal places?
(07-07-2022 08:06 PM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-06-2022 09:02 PM)kibato9999 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi guys just got myself a new LG 32 inch 32GN63T UltraGear QHD 165Hz Monitor.
I have always used CRU to disable TV resolutions on my monitors and it has always worked but I have done the exact same way I have been doing for the past many years now and its not working for I always do this so that I can use Nvidia Super Resolution scaling otherwise it will always try and scale from a 1080P resolution even though my native is 1440P.

I have already deleted all resolutions that I would normally delete but nothing seems to change.
You need to read the section about extension blocks in the first post.

Thank you I deleted the default extension block and it started working what's annoying is that this is now my 3rd monitor with this GPU and I had never needed to do that before with both my Samsung and Acer monitors but all of a sudden it became an issue with this specific LG monitor.
(07-07-2022 08:06 PM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-06-2022 07:41 PM)IIISi Z16 HF LE Wrote: [ -> ]HI toastyX
I have little bit progressed .
I have purcahsed more advanced usb-c to hdmi 2.1 adapter Sabrent
Now I can enable HDR on mine Sam TV and windows 11 showing in resolution I can now select 100Hz or 120Hz for 4k but when I select it it just reverts back to 60Hz .
I don't really know whow to use yours soft I have tried to do detailed resolution top one But I tried 4k@120 bit won't let me from all drop down options all red.. Only when I tried 4k@75Hz it allowed select exact reduced. BUt I have restarted windows but it is not showing 4k@75Hz option in windows refresh rate settings.
How can I add ? Or I was wondering how to do 4k@120 but with limited colour sdepth 8bit and dinamic range to limited and output color format to 444 or 422
But you don't include these options in your soft?
You need to use a DisplayID extension block to add resolutions greater than 655.35 MHz pixel clock as explained in the first post. 4K @ 75 Hz should have worked though so the driver is ignoring it for some reason. 4K @ 100/120 Hz should already be defined in the extension block in the TV resolutions data block.

DisplayPort/USB-C has less bandwidth than HDMI 2.1, so the default 4K @ 100/120 Hz requires either YCbCr 4:2:2 or display stream compression (DSC). "Native (PC)" would bring the pixel clock down low enough for YCbCr/RGB 4:4:4 without DSC, but the TV might not support that timing.

8 bpc should always be available. Dynamic range is set in the GPU's control panel and not in the EDID. RGB color format should always be available. YCbCr color formats are listed in the HDMI data blocks in the extension block, but since you're using a DisplayPort/USB-C adapter, it might be in the display properties ("Edit..." button at the top of the main window). YCbCr 4:2:2 is normally supported and should be available without any changes, but I don't know if the adapter is messing that up.

Hi Toasty thanks for the reply.

I find your software complicated.. nvidia c panel has it best and stupid intel has blocked all custmizations including colour formats and dynamic ranges
Where I should add it ? DisplayID extension block to add resolutions greater than 655.35 MHz pixel clock as explained in the first post which section ?

Edit : Found it Should I use Display ID 1.3 or 2.0 ?
- Extention block showing Type CTA-861 one resolution added which is 2k@120
- TV resolutions showing both 4k@120 and 4k@100Hz
- HDMi support max 300Mhz Only 4k 24hzand 4k@30Hz HDMi 2.1 showing bunch of many features hav eno idea what they mean ..
4:2:0 resolutions showing both 4k@120 and 4k@100
free sync range from 48-120Hz
Should I add extention block or better add new ? and choose Display ID ? 1.3 or 2.0 ?



I have added 4k@75 in top detailed resolution then used arrow up to be first then clicked on restart64 and it didn't add in windows resolution setting nor intel command center. My tv supports full 4k@120 it has hdmi 2.1 .

DisplayPort/USB-C adapter is less than HDMi2.1?? Really ?? I thought using thunderbolt 4 port on todays laptops is best connector surpassing HDMi 2.1 and USB4. Intel claiming that all connections are implemented in to tb4 .
Ma I missing something ?

According Intel it supports 8k@60 which means 4k@120 should work as 8k@60 is more bandwidth (please see the pics)

Mine TV support it I have Desktop PC and all working perfect even via HDMi 2.0 nvidia c panel set custom resol. automatically but some strange reason not from the laptop which is better equipped.. supposedly

I have Samsung Q85T 55'' 4k@120. And I just achieved 4k@120 straight away with HDMi to HDMi cable. It shows reduced colours settings on Desktop PC.

1.Outpur colour format : YCbCr420
2.Desktop colour depth 32 Bit
3.Output color format 8Bpc

G-sync - vrr working and HDR too

to achieve even RGB colour format, 10 bit output color format and dynamic range full and keep 4k@120

So I have purchased Displayport to HDMi 8K cable (see pic) connecte do nvidia GTX 1660 Super and all works. but colour formats are on full but

unfortunately g-sync and vrr is not present HDR works

It runs all colour formats RGB, full, and 10 bit (please see picture

But there is not possible to set color formats ,dynamic ranges et in crappy Intel command center.. They stated that dongles and adapters are not supported.. and here the problem lies . they even blcking custom resolutions settings.

That's why with nvidia c panel it works.. You can configure there with ease..

If we could hack old intel graphic control centre ? I can't run it ..

I think no matter what I configure in your soft , it will be ignored by intel ! gpu and its softare in windosws

We need to contact microosoft to add custom resolutions implementing into windows 11 display settings
(07-08-2022 09:21 AM)IIISi Z16 HF LE Wrote: [ -> ]I find your software complicated.. nvidia c panel has it best and stupid intel has blocked all custmizations including colour formats and dynamic ranges
Where I should add it ? DisplayID extension block to add resolutions greater than 655.35 MHz pixel clock as explained in the first post which section ?
CRU is an EDID editor, and EDIDs are complicated because they are a mishmash of several different standards created over the years. When CRU was first conceived, HDMI 2.x didn't exist, DisplayID wasn't in use, and the first 4K displays could only do 30 Hz. The EDID standard can't define detailed resolutions greater than 655.35 MHz pixel clock, so 4K @ 100/120 Hz has to be defined either using TV resolutions or using a DisplayID extension block.

All you have to do is add an extension block and set the type to DisplayID. Either 1.3 and 2.0 should work. Then you can add detailed resolutions by adding a data block in the extension block. If the resolutions you add don't appear in Windows after restarting, then either there's a driver limitation or a hardware limitation. Usually the limit is a pixel clock limit. If you can add a resolution up to 600 MHz pixel clock but not anything above, then I would consider that a driver bug because it's incorrectly applying the HDMI 2.0 limit to a DisplayPort/USB-C adapter. Try adding 3840x2160 @ 55 Hz and see if that appears. If nothing you add appears no matter what, then the EDID override is being ignored by the driver for some reason, which I would also consider a driver bug. I'm only familiar with AMD and NVIDIA, so I'm not sure what limitations Intel has. Intel didn't even support EDID overrides until a few years ago, and there have been cases where EDID overrides are ignored, usually with laptop screens, but it's supposed to work with extenal displays.

I want to make CRU 2.0 simpler by consolidating all the resolutions into one list and managing extension blocks automatically, but that will require a complete rewrite and redesign. That's about all I can do to make things simpler without hiding things.

And yes, DisplayPort 1.4 has less bandwidth than HDMI 2.1. DisplayPort 1.4 can handle up to 1080 MHz pixel clock without compression, while HDMI 2.1 can handle at least 1782 MHz at 48 Gbps. 7680x4320 @ 60 Hz is only possible with DisplayPort 1.4 when using compression.
(07-08-2022 06:12 AM)kibato9999 Wrote: [ -> ]Thank you I deleted the default extension block and it started working what's annoying is that this is now my 3rd monitor with this GPU and I had never needed to do that before with both my Samsung and Acer monitors but all of a sudden it became an issue with this specific LG monitor.
That's because newer high-resolution monitors use a DisplayID extension block to define resolutions greater than 655.35 MHz pixel clock, but NVIDIA's driver has a bug that prevents reading the second extension block, and another bug that causes all changes to be ignored if a default extension block exists.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809
Reference URL's