Monitor Tests Forum

Full Version: Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951
Hey guys! I've looked around everywhere but I can't find an actual answer - maybe someone here knows. Is there a way to add a custom resolution on a neo G7. It has the same panel as the g8, so 240hz should work.

This is on nvidia, apparent amd cards have no issues with this. Cheers!
Hi , i have an Acer monitor V246HL @ 60hz , it has 1 DVI port and 1 VGA port. (this is my second monitor but i am intending to gift it)
It is connected to a RTX 2060 super GPU via DVI SL cable.

The DVI port on the monitor has the holes for Dual Link DVI but i coudnt find anywhere information about if the port is actual DL or not , i only have SL-DVI cable atm.
Some variation of this monitor model with the same specs have display port too and thats what makes me think maybe the DVI port could be DL.
Found a similar monitor that its rated at 75hz and it says that the DVI is dual link: https://www.displaydb.ro/monitor/acer-v246hl-bmdp
My model is v246hl bmd UM.FV6EE.005

I have some questions/ problems.
Does it worth getting a DL-DVI cable for it? (im OC-ing the monitor ofc)

I tried the patcher and it doesnt seem to make any difference, the max clock seems to be @ ~165.6Mhz, going any higher i am getting "Input is not supported".

I managed to OC it to 75HZ with this settings"
H: 32 32 32 96 2016
V: 3 4 4 11 1091

The problem is that i am getting a lot of tearing in games when i am using it at 75Hz but it seems that is working without tear at stock 60hz.

After playing a bit with the settings seems that i can get 75Hz with different timings, something like: ( i didnt try to see if tearing is gone yet with this settings)
H: 8 32 32 72 1992
V: 14 8 6 28 1108
(i started tweaking the values from CVT-RB2 standard and changed H Black porch from 40 to 32 and V Front Porch from 25 to 14 (i think it works with 16 too)

My question is what timing are better lowering/ tweaking so i can be @ max 165.6MHZ pixel clock and maybe to get rid of the tearing (if possible)?

Atm i am playing with V Front porch and H Back porch, should i lower V Front porch and leave the H Back porch higher or viceversa? It seems that is working doing it both ways with different values if i keep the pixel clock below 165.6Mhz

I am getting tearing at 75Hz with the old settings even if i cap the fps at a stable 75fps or if im uncapping the FPS, seems that capping the fps higher gives me less tearing but is still too much, only the Vsync seems to help which i do not like.

Edit: In the user manual i found this but the manual is like somehow general for all the variation of this model.
Anyway if it does indeed have dvi-DL could i get maybe a higher OC?
[Image: 8JfSFXE.png]
(03-17-2023 08:00 AM)izy Wrote: [ -> ]Hi , i have an Acer monitor V246HL @ 60hz , it has 1 DVI port and 1 VGA port. (this is my second monitor but i am intending to gift it)
It is connected to a RTX 2060 super GPU via DVI SL cable.

The DVI port on the monitor has the holes for Dual Link DVI but i coudnt find anywhere information about if the port is actual DL or not , i only have SL-DVI cable atm.
Some variation of this monitor model with the same specs have display port too and thats what makes me think maybe the DVI port could be DL.
Found a similar monitor that its rated at 75hz and it says that the DVI is dual link: https://www.displaydb.ro/monitor/acer-v246hl-bmdp
My model is v246hl bmd UM.FV6EE.005

I have some questions/ problems.
Does it worth getting a DL-DVI cable for it? (im OC-ing the monitor ofc)

I tried the patcher and it doesnt seem to make any difference, the max clock seems to be @ ~165.6Mhz, going any higher i am getting "Input is not supported".

I managed to OC it to 75HZ with this settings"
H: 32 32 32 96 2016
V: 3 4 4 11 1091

The problem is that i am getting a lot of tearing in games when i am using it at 75Hz but it seems that is working without tear at stock 60hz.
There's no reason for that monitor to have dual-link DVI. The patcher is for GPU driver limitations, not monitor limitations. Tearing has nothing to do with the monitor or the timing parameters. Use vsync if you don't want tearing.
someone understand Huh what config must use in cru for 75hz for hp e190i.
as i read internet info, this is standard freq for this model. but i havnt 75hz in os

this is cru automatic pc setting:

[Image: image.png]

this is original monitor setting:

[Image: image.png]
(03-17-2023 06:51 PM)pakos2835 Wrote: [ -> ]someone understand Huh what config must use in cru for 75hz for hp e190i.
as i read internet info, this is standard freq for this model. but i havnt 75hz in os
That's a 60 Hz monitor.
(03-17-2023 01:11 PM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-17-2023 08:00 AM)izy Wrote: [ -> ]Hi , i have an Acer monitor V246HL @ 60hz , it has 1 DVI port and 1 VGA port. (this is my second monitor but i am intending to gift it)
It is connected to a RTX 2060 super GPU via DVI SL cable.

The DVI port on the monitor has the holes for Dual Link DVI but i coudnt find anywhere information about if the port is actual DL or not , i only have SL-DVI cable atm.
Some variation of this monitor model with the same specs have display port too and thats what makes me think maybe the DVI port could be DL.
Found a similar monitor that its rated at 75hz and it says that the DVI is dual link: https://www.displaydb.ro/monitor/acer-v246hl-bmdp
My model is v246hl bmd UM.FV6EE.005

I have some questions/ problems.
Does it worth getting a DL-DVI cable for it? (im OC-ing the monitor ofc)

I tried the patcher and it doesnt seem to make any difference, the max clock seems to be @ ~165.6Mhz, going any higher i am getting "Input is not supported".

I managed to OC it to 75HZ with this settings"
H: 32 32 32 96 2016
V: 3 4 4 11 1091

The problem is that i am getting a lot of tearing in games when i am using it at 75Hz but it seems that is working without tear at stock 60hz.
There's no reason for that monitor to have dual-link DVI. The patcher is for GPU driver limitations, not monitor limitations. Tearing has nothing to do with the monitor or the timing parameters. Use vsync if you don't want tearing.

Thanks for the reply , that is what i thought too but i had to be sure, i see no reason for DL on the monitor but in the manual says its DL (in the specs only says DVI-D) and I was wondering if indeed its DL if i could get an higher OC because of the higher bandwidth.
I was not sure about the tearing as i am not having tearing at 60hz but i am having it at 75hz and more noticeable if i cap the fps at 75fps, using like 72hz , 73hz without altering CRU timings has less tearing and thats why i was confused.

Edit: pic with the back of the board , seems that it has the pins for DVI-D DL soldered if i am not wrong:
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/1OoAAOSwE...-l1600.jpg
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/p5MAAOSwb...-l1600.jpg
So, I've this old Asus VH222 1080p 75Hz monitor, paired with a R9 380. As you can tell, this setup is ancient and the R9 380 is essentially a 1050Ti that consumes almost 3x more power.

Now the thing is, this setup is no longer able to hit solid 60, let alone 75. So, what I've done is underclocked my monitor to various refresh rates (40/45/48/50Hz) via CRU. When I can't hit 75, I just move down to 60 > 50 > 45 so on (48Hz is just for films).

The problem is that it's getting harder to maintain even solid 45FPS and when I set the refresh rate to 40Hz, the input lag just gets unbearable. It feels fine at 45Hz, BTW. My question is, is there a way to improve input latency?

Detailed resolutions have lots of parameters etc. so I was wondering if it's possible to somehow "tighten" the monitor's timings or something at 40Hz, just to make it more bearable? For example, high refresh rate monitors often suck at 60Hz because they introduce a lot of input lag and I feel like I'm facing a similar "phenomenon" at 40Hz on my 75Hz monitor.

Like for example, the Asus VG279QM has extremely high input lag at 60Hz, as per Rtings: https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/a...#test_1435

So, is there a way to lower the input lag or am I all out of luck?

Thanks in advance.
(03-19-2023 07:15 AM)Man Wrote: [ -> ]So, I've this old Asus VH222 1080p 75Hz monitor, paired with a R9 380. As you can tell, this setup is ancient and the R9 380 is essentially a 1050Ti that consumes almost 3x more power.

Now the thing is, this setup is no longer able to hit solid 60, let alone 75. So, what I've done is underclocked my monitor to various refresh rates (40/45/48/50Hz) via CRU. When I can't hit 75, I just move down to 60 > 50 > 45 so on (48Hz is just for films).

The problem is that it's getting harder to maintain even solid 45FPS and when I set the refresh rate to 40Hz, the input lag just gets unbearable. It feels fine at 45Hz, BTW. My question is, is there a way to improve input latency?

Detailed resolutions have lots of parameters etc. so I was wondering if it's possible to somehow "tighten" the monitor's timings or something at 40Hz, just to make it more bearable? For example, high refresh rate monitors often suck at 60Hz because they introduce a lot of input lag and I feel like I'm facing a similar "phenomenon" at 40Hz on my 75Hz monitor.

Like for example, the Asus VG279QM has extremely high input lag at 60Hz, as per Rtings: https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/a...#test_1435

So, is there a way to lower the input lag or am I all out of luck?

Thanks in advance.
Only certain high refresh rate monitors with FreeSync have lag at 60 Hz. Most monitors don't behave that way. Monitors that don't buffer frames usually have no significant lag at any refresh rate. You mentioned you prefer using vsync with the frame rate capped. That's where the lag is coming from. The only way to avoid that lag is to disable vsync and remove frame rate caps.
(03-17-2023 10:19 PM)izy Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for the reply , that is what i thought too but i had to be sure, i see no reason for DL on the monitor but in the manual says its DL (in the specs only says DVI-D) and I was wondering if indeed its DL if i could get an higher OC because of the higher bandwidth.
I was not sure about the tearing as i am not having tearing at 60hz but i am having it at 75hz and more noticeable if i cap the fps at 75fps, using like 72hz , 73hz without altering CRU timings has less tearing and thats why i was confused.

Edit: pic with the back of the board , seems that it has the pins for DVI-D DL soldered if i am not wrong:
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/1OoAAOSwE...-l1600.jpg
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/p5MAAOSwb...-l1600.jpg
You shouldn't cap the frame rate to the refresh rate. That's the worst thing you can do for tearing because you'll get a jiggling line. Tearing looks bad when the frame rate is close to the refresh rate. You want the frame rate to be as high as possible away from the refresh rate. If that's not achievable, then at least cap it to something a few frames below the refresh rate. Capping the frame rate to 70 FPS at 75 Hz will look better because the tearing won't be in one spot. The only way to avoid tearing completely is to use vsync, but that will add lag.

Most 60 Hz monitors are hard-coded to reject anything beyond 75-85 Hz. Using a dual-link DVI cable won't change what refresh rates the monitor will accept. The monitor and GPU have no way of knowing if you're using a single-link or dual-link cable. The GPU always sends a single-link signal up to 165 MHz pixel clock and a dual-link signal beyond 165 MHz no matter what cable is being used. The patcher raises that to 230 MHz. If the monitor actually supports dual-link DVI, then you won't need the patcher beyond 165 MHz. If the monitor only supports single-link DVI and the GPU sends a dual-link signal, the monitor will ignore the other link and the resolution will have a blocky look with half the pixels missing unless you use the patcher to send a single-link signal. That 165 MHz switchover is exact by the way, so anything beyond that is a monitor limitation.
(03-20-2023 04:21 AM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]Only certain high refresh rate monitors with FreeSync have lag at 60 Hz. Most monitors don't behave that way. Monitors that don't buffer frames usually have no significant lag at any refresh rate. You mentioned you prefer using vsync with the frame rate capped. That's where the lag is coming from. The only way to avoid that lag is to disable vsync and remove frame rate caps.


I see. I didn't realize that some monitors have frame buffers. BTW, is there a way to 'test' whether or not the monitor has a frame buffer? The thing is, I've been meaning to replace my entire setup and am thinking about getting at least a 144Hz FreeSync monitor so... just in case.

Googled turned up nothing and you're pretty much the go-to-guy when it comes to monitors so I apologize for asking so many questions!

Thanks in advance.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951
Reference URL's