(05-19-2026 04:00 PM)wmxp Wrote: [ -> ]When I do want 240Hz, I have that set to use the HDMI 2.1 connection for the increased bandwidth and less aggressive DSC profile.
Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 (G95SD)
1 x DisplayPort HBR3
2 x HDMI 2.1 FRL5
5120 x 1440 @ 240 Hz RGB 10-bit (Samsung Custom Video Timing) =
1939.5 MHz pixel clock ~ 224% HBR3 / 173% FRL5
Without DSC, this video mode is not possible.
How did you access the DisplayPort DPCD to determine which DSC parameters are being used? What does it say for:
• Rate Control Buffer Size
• Number of slices supported
• Color Depth and Format
• Block Prediction Support
• Decompressor Throughput
• Max Slice Width
• BPP Increment
When using the VMM7100 protocol converter (DP HBR3 > HDMI FRL) and external feed of the G95SD EDID on the HDMI side, the protocol converter's diagnostic shows the following:
----------------------------
RX: SST 4lane HBR3 mode, DSC ON FEC ON, FEC enabled, Lock sts: 001000f0
Symbol error recently: 8000 8000 8000 8000, in 1s: 8000 8000 8000 8000
RFRM0: 5120x1440@239.74Hz RGB 10bpc, pixel clock: 1939.3MHz, Audio enabled, state 8
Audio: 2 channel 48.0KHz 16bits LPCM audio
HT: 5440, VT: 1487, HA: 5120, VA: 1440, HS: 192, VS: 14, HSW: 32, VSW: 8, HPOL: 0, VPOL: 1
DSC1.2 stream: PIC 5120x1440, Slice 640x1440,
12.81 BPP, Compress ratio: 2.3:1
Chunk 1025, Line 13, RGB 1, S422: 0, VBR 0, BP 1, Ctrl bc004012, Sts 00
----------------------------
The source here is an Nvidia graphics card.
A compression ratio of 2.3:1 is not the highest possible and results in a data payload of approximately 31 Gbps over the cable. I don't believe DisplayPort and HDMI differ significantly in this respect.
On Nvidia GeForce RTX 30 or 40 series graphics cards, EDID overrides are ignored by the Nvidia driver when the required pixel clock of the output signal exceeds
1350 MHz. This has nothing to do with DSC. It is the threshold at which the graphics card requires two internal heads to drive the display. Why the operating system's EDID override mechanism also ceases to function then remains a mystery known only to Nvidia (References: [
1], [
2]).
Is your card an Nvidia RTX 30 or 40 series device?
(05-19-2026 04:00 PM)wmxp Wrote: [ -> ]Sometimes *super* ultrawide 32:9 is just a bit much for a given game, so I used CRU to introduce the 3440x1440 21:9 middle ground. I edited the Display ID 1.3 datablock, deleted the 5120x1440@60Hz entry, and added 3440x1440@120 with no issues and it works great over DP. I wanted to try that resolution @240hz though, but I get a blank screen on DP, and the custom res doesn't show up at all on the HDMI connection.
Please try the video timing shown in the attachment. It's from a Dell Alienware AW3425DW monitor. It just barely stays below 1350 MHz.