Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)
|
05-18-2014, 12:18 PM
(Last edited: 05-18-2014, 12:19 PM by derpycat)
Post: #882
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)
(05-18-2014 11:07 AM)ToastyX Wrote:(05-18-2014 12:40 AM)derpycat Wrote: 1. Is there any likelyhood of the CRU becoming more precise in future? The Nvidia control panel option looks like it can set a more precise pixel clock, allowing for example 120fps instead of 120.003fps like in CRU.That's not possible with EDID overrides, but you can adjust the totals to get a more precise value. If this is a 1920x1080 monitor, setting the totals to 2080x1150 will give you an exact 120 Hz, and setting the totals to 2080x1155 will give you an exact 119.880119880... Hz. Keep in mind that the calculated values might not match actual performance because of hardware variance. Thanks very much for the reply. So with the second answer, I suppose I'm out of luck using an AMD card, then? Not that it's relevant anymore, but the reason I wanted a more precise value (i.e. both 119.998 and 119.88) is because it seems from some very quick testing that 119.998hz offers less tearing than 119.982hz (monitor default) without vsync in games that manage precisely 120 or 60fps, and so presumably 119.88hz wouldn't be as good as 119.998hz either. As an example, the Street Fighter IV series on the PC is locked to 60fps, and the game displays a constant 60.0fps at all times during gameplay. It seems to me as if 119.998hz has resulted in less tearing than usual - no visible tearing during gameplay, in fact. The reason I want 119.88hz is because there's a duplicate frame every 40-50 seconds using 119.982hz or 119.998hz in video playback, as opposed to one every few hours. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 85 Guest(s)