NVIDIA Pixel Clock Patcher

[ToastyX]

(08-25-2016 03:02 AM)jaytea33 Wrote:  EDIT: Ok the Reduced Timing did it. Is there any downside to doing this in regard to response time or anything?

It does not affect response times. The only disadvantage is NVIDIA GPUs won't clock down when idle if the vertical total is too low.

(08-25-2016 03:02 AM)jaytea33 Wrote:  Also, verrry strange results for some reason. I managed to get it to 75hz on reduced timing, with a pixel clock of 164.61. The highest I can get with standard timings is 164.96. If I try to up it to 76hz on reduced timings, that brings it to 164.81, below the 165hz threshold. Doesn't say "Out of Range" but doesn't apply the resolution, just reverts back to previous. If I try to go to 77hz on reduced timings it goes to 164.96, matching the max allowed with standard timings, and I get the same result as with 76hz. Really weird, I'm not sure what the limitation is other than the pixel clock.

That seems like a driver bug. Maybe the hardware can't handle lower horizontal totals, but then the driver shouldn't list the refresh rate.