Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)

[falcao123456]

(09-28-2019 04:00 PM)ToastyX Wrote:  

(09-28-2019 03:15 AM)falcao123456 Wrote:  ToastyX please help me, I have a SyncMaster 794MB plus CRT monitor, and with it using its CRU tool I can force resolutions of 640x480p 144hz, 1024x768i 162hz, 640x480i 162hz. And I have some doubts.
Why can not I put 640x480p 162hz, and I can 1024x768i 162hz? Is there any way to force 1024x768p 144hz or 162hz?
Or 640x480p 162hz?

Are you asking about adding resolutions or about the monitor displaying the resolutions? If you can add 1024x768i @ 162 Hz, then you should be able to add 640x480p @ 162 Hz, but whether or not the monitor will display the resolution is a different question. The specs state the monitor supports a horizontal scan rate up to 70 kHz, which would allow 1024x768i @ 162 Hz but not 640x480p @ 162 Hz. If you can add 640x480p @ 144 Hz, then the actual limit might be higher. You'll have to test what the monitor will accept.

(09-28-2019 03:15 AM)falcao123456 Wrote:  And does the interlaced signal work as efficiently as the progressive signal? At least in a matter of movement on the screen, forgetting the quality. For example, when selecting the option it appears as 1024x768i 81hz and not 1024x768i 162hz.

Windows lists the frame rate, while CRU uses the field rate. Visually, the movement updates at the field rate. It's just missing half the lines per refresh. You can check by adding 80 Hz interlaced, which Windows will list as 40 Hz interlaced, but it will be smoother than 40 Hz progressive and won't flicker as badly.

---------"Are you asking about adding resolutions or about the monitor displaying the resolutions? "---------
I am asking both.

I can put 640x480p (144hz), 1024x768i (162hz) and 640x480i (162hz). But what I do not understand is precisely because I can not put 640x480p 162hz. Since the monitor supports 1024x768i (162hz) which is already a high value.




--------"Windows lists the frame rate, while CRU uses the field rate. Visually, the movement updates at the field rate. It's just missing half the lines per refresh. You can check by adding 80 Hz interlaced, which Windows will list as 40 Hz interlaced, but it will be smoother than 40 Hz progressive and won't flicker as badly."---------

So in the visual matter (movement) it is really showing 162hz. if you put 640x480i (162hz) or 1024x768i (162hz) against 640x480p 144hz, will the resolutions (640x480i (162hz) and 1024x768i (162hz) win?

one thing i forgot to mention is that i use the
HDMI to VGA converter.
https://cdn-cosmos.bluesoft.com.br/produ...8575248124

and while I'm using windows with interlaced resolutions like (480i and 768i (162), the value 42.5k / 162 pn and 65.8k / 162 pn appears on the monitor panel.

Anyway, is there any way to force more than that?
For I do not think for example that 640x480p 144hz is the limit of this monitor. it should surely support 145hz up to 160hz at least at this resolution, and the weirdest thing is that at 1024x768p the maximum I can climb is up to 90hz, and the monitor already comes with 85hz enabled.