Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)

[Boildown]

(08-06-2013 10:54 PM)ToastyX Wrote:  

(08-06-2013 10:35 PM)Boildown Wrote:  Its a single-link DVI port on the video card that goes to the capture card.

I have a GTX 680, which has:
1 HDMI (unused), 1 DisplayPort (unused), 1 dual-link DVI (120Hz Monitor), 1 single-link DVI (capture card).

GTX 680 cards usually have two dual-link DVI ports.

I just checked and you're correct, I was incorrectly assuming that because one was DVI-I and the other DVI-D, that one was dual and the other was single, but they're both dual-link.

I just tested and this was successful:

[Image: http://imgur.com/J5Pf23q.jpg]

Yet this was not:

[Image: http://imgur.com/tBr3zJ6.jpg]

For the record 96Hz was also successful. Many people stream at 48Hz (for some reason this is supposed to be better than 45Hz, even though to me 45Hz seems like a more natural fraction of 60/120Hz that the monitor probably runs at), so if there's a benefit to streaming at half of the input, this is a good thing.

So that confirms your theory on the 230 MHz limit being the limit. This capture card gets more amazing by the minute on what it can do on a single-link DVI connection.

Right now I'm going to stream with 90Hz input but at LCD Standard timings instead of LCD Reduced that I used last night. 210.98 Mhz. I have no idea if that makes any difference but it sounds better in my head.

Why would using your 1.2 patch cause my other adapter to go single-link? Would it affect the DisplayPort?