Monitor Tests Forum

Full Version: Custom Resolution Utility (CRU)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815
(02-05-2014 12:18 PM)hannes69 Wrote: [ -> ]Beside that I want to replace my current GPU (Radeon HD4550) with a newer model with more power, Powerstrip fully supports only models up to the HD4000 series.
So two reasons to change over from Powerstrip to CRU.
So what´s the problem? - As far as I can see, CRU allows setting the pixelclock frequency to 2 decimal places, that isn´t sufficient for a really accurate setting of the refresh rate for a movie to avoid framedrops/repeats. With Powerstrip there are 5 or 6 decimal places, that´s ok.
So, where sits the limitation of this within CRU and why can Powerstrip work more accurate?
CRU creates EDID overrides. EDIDs only have two decimal places for the pixel clock. PowerStrip controls the video card directly through its own driver. I don't know any other program that can adjust the pixel clock with that much precision. I remember PowerStrip working with 5000/6000-series cards even though they're not officially supported. 7000-series cards won't work though.

(02-05-2014 12:18 PM)hannes69 Wrote: [ -> ]Another question to ToastyX especially because as author of this software I hope you can give me an answer or idea:
Is there an tool / excelfile / script to show combinations of the porches with corresponding pixelclock setting for a wanted refresh rate?
The pixel clock is just the total number of pixels per second (horizontal total * vertical total * refresh rate). Keep in mind that the hardware clock is not 100% accurate, so some adjustment will still be required to achieve an exact rate.
ToastyX I've got a problem.

I tried to follow your steps but 'cause I'm noob with pc I failed.

My monitor is refreshed into 75hz (60hz default and 72-75 if I use AMD VISION) and aparrently cannot support more than these values.

The steps were:

1) Click on AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher, patch, reboot.
2) Click on CRU, delete all configs. Make new configs about my resolution desired (1600x900 @85hz) Reboot.
3) So I wrote after that on windows search "display", then I went to adjust resolution, then advanced settings, then monitor, then monitor settings, screen refresh rate, and finally I unchecked the box about only use default hz modes. So I was able to change the hz from 60hz to 85hz, and what happened? Black screen and the AI monitor telling me about something like that "higher frecuency than supported" and after a few seconds the black screen dissapeared.

So after that, I tried using AMD Vision Engine Control Center. I was able to put my max. resolution on 2560*1536 and max hz on 200hz. After that I manage the option about select desktop resolution. I put 1600x900 and 85hz, didn't work. So I tried using a lower hz, 75hz, and voila it's works.
But I tried again after my little win with higher values of frecuency, and it didn't work. Trying everything I saw an option which said something about "use EDID drivers default", I checked the box option and click okay, the result was a black screen as happened to me in other ocassions when I tried to gain more hz, but this time the black screen kept forever on my screen, it's not disabled. So I joined on Windows on secure mode low resolution (640x480), I manage AMD VISION to change my resolution to 1600x900 @75hz + disabling "use EDID drivers default" + restoring settings from AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher + restore setttings from CRU.

I hope you can help me.

[Image: http://oi59.tinypic.com/wri4bs.jpg]
[Image: http://oi61.tinypic.com/v61b48.jpg]

PS. Sorry for my bad english, thx you so much. I will donate you a little amount if you can help me reach more than 75hz.

Finally about my specs:

BenQ GL2460
ATI 4850 512MB connected through VGA to BenQ (this card don't have dvi or hdmi)
Phenom II 965BE @3,4GHZ
4GB RAM DDR3
Quote:EDIDs only have two decimal places for the pixel clock.
Ok, I understand, nothing to do at this point to increase the accuracy...

Quote:The pixel clock is just the total number of pixels per second (horizontal total * vertical total * refresh rate). Keep in mind that the hardware clock is not 100% accurate, so some adjustment will still be required to achieve an exact rate.
My projector can work with many porch and pixelclock combinations. I thougt about a script which delivers all possible porch-pixelclock combinations for a given refresh rate. For Powerstrip I had found such a script a few years ago, but the website doesn´t exist anymore and I have lost the script... With the accuracy of Powerstrip there were >20 different porch-pixelclock settings for a given refresh rate that were perfect enough for drop/repeatless movie playback within a few hours. It´s much work and trial and error process to find out these combinations manually... Lower one porch, higher another, higher the pixel clock, ... to hopefully get eg. a vertical frequency between 23.9759 and 23.9761. With only 2 decimal places for the pixelclock the goal is probably achieveable by one combination or with less luck with no combination. I´ll try if I can do a little script and try out. The automatic display switching feature of madvr in combination with CRU would be really nice. If it doesn´t work I´ll stick to Powerstrip, and when I change my GPU I would have to work with smoothmotion so no different refresh rates needed anymore. Not the perfect solution, but maybe I can live with that.
Greetings, Hannes.
I have a question. I am having an issue with my games recognizing the 120hz option or 115...whatever profile I created in CRU doesn't appear to be picked up in the games. The nvidia control panel seems to pick them up fine.

I am running an Nvidia GTX 670 with an overlord tempest overclockable monitor 2560x1400.

I've had the games pick them up before but it seems very inconsistent and if I restart it disappears. Any help would be appreciated.
(02-09-2014 12:08 AM)Gouda Wrote: [ -> ]I have a question. I am having an issue with my games recognizing the 120hz option or 115...whatever profile I created in CRU doesn't appear to be picked up in the games. The nvidia control panel seems to pick them up fine.
Are the refresh rates listed in the Windows screen resolution settings? Did you uninstall GeForce Experience?
(02-07-2014 04:28 AM)antonio93 Wrote: [ -> ]ToastyX I've got a problem.

I tried to follow your steps but 'cause I'm noob with pc I failed.

My monitor is refreshed into 75hz (60hz default and 72-75 if I use AMD VISION) and aparrently cannot support more than these values.
I'm not seeing what the problem is. You're able to get 75 Hz, which is typical. Most monitors don't support more than 70-77 Hz. You don't need the patch with VGA.
(02-06-2014 02:28 PM)Dragonheart Wrote: [ -> ]Hi guys!
I'm choosing a new monitor for my friend, currently thinking of something like Benq GL2460. Is there any statistics about it's overclocking capabilities? I would really like to get 75Hz at least.
Looks like it can get 75 Hz, according to antonio93.
(02-06-2014 05:46 AM)Pda Wrote: [ -> ]I've managed to have Windows showing again with two screens working at same time.The trick is i can get output working on my T.V but ONLY with DVI/HDMI adaptor slotted on my graphical card's second DVI output.The direct HDMI is stilly desperatly showing nothing on my Panasonic plasma.
The TV should work just by plugging it in. You shouldn't have to do anything special to get it working. It might be an NVIDIA driver bug. Try an older driver like 320.49. Some NVIDIA users have had trouble with recent drivers not working with their display: https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic...-1-23-14-/

(02-06-2014 05:46 AM)Pda Wrote: [ -> ]Without HDMI direct,if i remember well,impossible to try your different Tweaks,right? Sad
Which tweaks? HDMI ports work like single-link DVI ports. It should work the same with DVI.
(02-05-2014 03:54 AM)ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-03-2014 09:10 PM)valerio65 Wrote: [ -> ]So there aren't anymore? I should use only the 60hz input? D:
Anymore what? If 75 Hz doesn't even work, then it probably can't handle anything over 60 Hz.

at 75 hz i show only a bit of the screen (the top part on the left) even if the resolution displayed is 1920x1080
Hello Toasty, thank you for your reply. I have reverted back to 7, because Vista was only using half of my CPU Power :/

ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]Make sure the highest resolution is listed first even if it's not native. You can use the arrow buttons to move them around. If the extension block is enabled, try disabling it.
I've tried everything you suggested me but none of them worked.

ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]Where did that happen?
Have a look at my screenshot below.

ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]That's a driver issue. I don't know why you are having this problem.
I don't think it's a driver issue, because other people still can apply custom resolutions/refresh rates with the latest AMD driver.

ToastyX Wrote: [ -> ]It should work with Windows 7. Something was getting in the way with your old setup, but I don't know what it could be.
I know it should work but I don't know what's causing the problem.

Here's a screenshot of my system:
[Image: http://s14.directupload.net/images/140209/9wfjrgu5.png]

This is exactly what will happen after I just add a simple custom refresh rate @1080p:
-Windows Aero turns off
-I can't change the resolution anymore
-No more monitors are displayed in Device Manager
-"Generic PnP-Monitor" changes to "Default Monitor"
-No more "active" monitors in CRU
-Only 60HZ option available
-Monitors OSD still reports 1920x1080@60hz
-In the screen resolution settings from windows it shows me six displays instead of just one
-Identifying or detecting my monitor does not work anymore

I would appreciate any help you can provide!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815
Reference URL's